Yes. That was an immediate concern I had when looking at the draft legislation.
I don't want to detract from the fact that most of the time that is what we're talking about, intimate partners, and the way this is drafted it's not required that spouses, common-law or dating partners live together. However, once we get beyond that to former spouses and other kinds of relatives, it seems to be, as I read this, that it's required that they be members of the same household. That seems odd to me and not really in keeping with the way that coercive control can work, even as a woman is trying to extricate herself from a relationship or for very vulnerable victims, children and older adults, who have no ability to extricate themselves or really to control someone's access, even if they're not living together.
Therefore, I would encourage taking a look at that definition and maybe thinking a bit more broadly about the kinds of relationships and situations where this behaviour can occur.