I want to reiterate some of the points that Ms. Damoff made and also the points just made by the departmental officials, which were very helpful.
To my mind, the open court principle is sufficient to address this baseline proposition about the accessibility of the reasons. The text of the bill as it's currently drafted indicates that where the matter is not an open proceeding and where there is no record, the reasons would need to be provided in writing, so my view would be to oppose this well-intended idea and to stick with the current bill in its current format.