Sorry, Madam Chair.
I was saying that I listened to Mr. Fergus' comments. Based on the same logic, I'm against this proposal.
I want to say again that this has nothing to do with the topic. Madam Chair, I wonder whether I should rise on a point of order. This has nothing to do with the purpose of the bill, which is to provide training to judges on the issue of victims of sexual assault. Here, the proposal is to provide training to judges on racism, discrimination, oppression, systemic oppression, systemic racism and systemic discrimination.
Judges already receive training on a variety of topics. We're not here to train judges. They're already trained. The bill talks about training judges on the specific characteristics of sexual assault victims. The proposal is off topic and has nothing to do with what was announced. In my opinion, it's out of order. I'm not even sure whether this committee has the legal right to rule on this matter without having heard from witnesses or having announced its work on these issues.
For all these reasons, I'm against the proposal.