Okay. Thank you, Chief Deer.
I'm going to quickly move over to the Central Ontario Standardbred Association, to Mr. O'Donnell or Mr. Drew, whoever wants to respond to this.
I agree with the first amendment. I thought the government's legislation was better than what we had drafted originally in this. I've been public on that. In fact, I have defended the government's legislation from attempts made in the House of Commons to repeal it, because I think it adds a value part for the horse racing industry.
However, I am having a little difficulty with regard to the historical betting, because it's fantasy betting, and it's done probably through some algorithms and other types of work, which are probably quite comprehensive, to ensure that there's proper management of it, and it's done on the basis of a couple of states in the U.S. It seems to me that it's premature for us to do that in this context.
Can you comment on that? Why should we change all of our Canadian laws when even in the United States there are only two states doing this kind of fantasy betting?