We agree on that. I think back to my trips to Haileybury for a one-hour pretrial. It would be a 13-hour day. My clients didn't like it, but there is some importance to being there in person.
You talked about deadlines at trials. There is some threat when somebody has to incur those costs to go to do that. It creates pressure that gets cases resolved, and that shouldn't be lost, but I'm glad to hear that the rules committee is dealing with that.
There's another thing, and I just want your thoughts on this. If you're having a Zoom trial or a Zoom process and it's appealed, right now judges go out of their way to make findings based on credibility, to make the decisions unappealable or hard to appeal, but in a world now where things are virtual, do you see lawyers asking that things be recorded virtually, which would then allow appellant courts to be asked to consider reviewing findings of credibility because they have the opportunity to look at witnesses?