Madam Chair, if I may, our Zoom trials have been an absolute godsend. The system would have failed completely without them. We have done very well for the past 13 or 14 months now, getting an awful lot of things done by Zoom.
As to your question about the airports and the courts and the interrelationship between those two things, the problem in the courts isn't a series of rich scofflaws taking $3,000 tickets at the airport because they want to go home. This is not the problem. Deflecting to suggest that the problem with COVID or with the justice system is a federal problem at the airport is, frankly, complete nonsense, with the greatest of respect, sir. This is not the issue.
If there are four people in Canada who took a $3,000 ticket in the past 12 months to enter Canada and say “The heck with you, I'm not going into quarantine—I can afford $3,000”, if you can find those four people, I would be amazed. This is not the issue.
With the greatest respect, what we have now, and what Mr. Sealy-Harrington was very clear to point out, is that you don't lose weight just by exercising. You have to lose weight by eating less. You have to digest less, which means that what we have is an entire system that is criminalizing mental health, poverty, domestic problems, and drug addiction and expecting the criminal justice system to solve all these social problems. It can't do that.