Yes, absolutely, because I don't accept any argument, especially from Liberal members, about any timeline whatsoever, when it was the Liberal government that prorogued the House.
I don't know if we need a refresher on what proroguing means, but proroguing means that all House business shuts down. Every bill starts over at zero. That's what it means to prorogue the House. This government did that, so we don't need to hear any arguments about the delay or any court-mandated timelines that are approaching.
When I look at our schedule, we're on track to meet that timeline. This isn't about anything other than the fact that next week is a constituency week, and I haven't heard one compelling reason we would all adjust our schedules, assuming people have a busy schedule next week, to have these meetings, when we're scheduled to meet the Tuesday and the Thursday when we return and then go into clause-by-clause.
No one has made any compelling argument why we would meet during a constituency week. I think we should adjourn this meeting and meet at our next scheduled time, which is the Tuesday of the next sitting week.