I can say absolutely not. We have access to the judgments that they think are among the most important, or if they are not members of the judiciary, articles or things so we can see their philosophy, and some of the questions on the questionnaire give them a chance to talk a bit about their philosophy and how they see the role of the judge, but we're not the least bit interested in that.
I actually think it's kind of a mug's game because the notion that the way that somebody votes in their civilian life will reflect the way they decide cases is actually not a very empirically well-established thing, so we don't interest ourselves in that at all, no.