Yes, absolutely. We have been actively documenting—and we can provide ample evidence, anecdotal evidence—cases that come to our attention through the mainstream press and on social media of instances of how, even with the universally applied requirement of the most fundamental safeguard of reasonably foreseeable natural death, we see adverse impacts on people with disabilities. This has led to the raising of a human rights concern, as Dr. Janz mentioned, with the special rapporteur from the UN on the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
We know there are problems with the existing law and we also understand that there is a review of that law scheduled at some point in the future, at which point I think we would advocate for much more rigorous and independent monitoring of the current practice of medical assistance in dying to ensure that it is applied and that its effects are equally felt and equally autonomy-promoting. At such a time, it seems really alarming to us—more than alarming, fundamentally wrong—to be removing safeguards, the most critical of which, as I've already said, is the requirement that you be at the end of your life.