Sure. I'd be happy to comment. Thank you, sir, for the question.
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't comment on the integrity and validity of the legal reasoning involved, but I will say in general, with respect to both the superior court decision in Ontario about the effective referral regime as well as the Truchon and Gladu decision, that the mere fact that the judge reached a decision does not imply that the decision was correct. Therefore, I don't think we can simply argue on the basis of the fact that the judge reached the decision that these concerns being raised are invalid.