Thank you very much, Madam Chair. I think if I hold the headset cord correctly, it may continue to work.
I have two things. To Madam Findlay, this is a safeguard added to the second track in the previous amendment we were voting on. Expertise was for the first track, so that is why there is the difference.
On the question of translation, I believe that at the end of the committee process we will authorize reconciliation of the two texts to make sure that they accurately reflect the sense of the bill. There is a chance, before this is referred to the House, for that reconciliation of the translations to occur.
I'm not saying there's no change here. It's clarifying something that was already put into the process by Bill C-7 about exactly who has to consult and how that consultation should be done. This is a problem that we run into in rural and remote communities, where we do not always have people with the expertise. This will require a consultation to take place. Yes, it may be with someone who is not even in the same community, but with someone who has experience and expertise with the condition that's causing the suffering. It's just clarifying those consultation procedures.