Well, when I read them, I look at them as three very different decisions. One said it was too vague. Another said it couldn't be saved in relation to teachers, but not to parents. Then one said it did offend the charter. One of the reasons is that it was broad in relation to a very slight use of force.
With all due respect, I don't think we can say the minority or the dissenters all got it right, because they got to very different places in very different ways. If we are going to correct the record, then let's be clear on that.
I want to ask you, Mr. Julian, about somebody symbolically correcting behaviour, which is what the Supreme Court talked about and what one of the dissenting judges talked about. I'm going to give you an example. Again, I just want to figure out what you believe should be covered. If a parent symbolically taps a wrist with two fingers, would that offend the criminal law, in your view? I'm sorry; I'll be more clear. Should that conduct be criminalized?