Further to that, I think Mr. Garrison is actually correct that we're not allowed to expand the scope of the private member's bill. With that in mind, then, to me, keeping section 43 as it is, knowing that the courts will interpret not just section 43 but also the Supreme Court's judgment upon that, will be important.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us in terms of expanding the scope of whom it covers? We've heard Mr. Housefather on including other people. I heard you clearly say parents and teachers, but you're not opposed.
Is that fair, Mr. Joly?