I have one quick question. We had witnesses at our last meeting who pointed out that Parliament never responded to the 2004 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, and that perhaps it is time to expand or further define the section 43 defence by codifying what the Supreme Court said. For example, it clarified that force must be sober and reasoned, and must not be applied to a child under two or over 13. Those are among the items that were listed in the Supreme Court of Canada decision.
What would you say about that? Would it be a good idea to have, for example, a section 43.1 that explains that?