I have a point of order, Madam Chair.
I'm going to make the same point on this amendment that I made on the last amendment: I believe it is out of order. The amendment repeats the language “if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances”, which is the exact language from section 43. Once again, it goes against the purpose of the bill, which is to repeal that language.
I can't understand how an amendment that puts back what the bill intends to remove can be in order at this point.
Thank you.