I also want to hear what Mr. Villetorte has to say on this, but, before that, I want to be sure we understand each other.
You referred to the United Nations and other states, and you mentioned corporal punishment. The checks I've done reveal the same thing. What we're aiming to abolish is corporal punishment, the act of striking a child because he or she hasn't been good. As for the reasonable use of force to control a child, however, nowhere do I see that prohibited, except here, perhaps, and that's why we're now having this discussion on section 43. That being said, we all agree that corporal punishment is an obsolete practice. It may have been okay a century ago, but no longer. If we confuse the two notions, that is to say corporal punishment and the reasonable use of force, we may find it hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. So we have to draw that distinction.
In addition to corporal punishment, does the United Nations prohibit or recommend prohibition of the use of force to control a child? I don't think that's the case, but I'm going to listen to what you have to say.