On that, I think your ruling is that we have to deal with clause 1 before you can deal with the motion, not that we have to deal with clause-by-clause. We could have a 300-clause bill, and not being able to entertain motions until it's over would be problematic.
I have to respond to what Mr. Maloney said. We mentioned the gap in the law. If the Minister of Justice is committing to responding to the teachers' concerns.... The teachers' concerns are with a gap in the law that's created by section 43 being removed. What they've said is that section 43 will put teachers and students at risk. That is their testimony. Their testimony is that the Teachers' Federation will advise teachers not to intervene—