It's a great question, Ziad. Obviously, it will take people from many disciplines to do it. It's not just government. It won't just be community leaders.
The role of education is not something to be overlooked. We may tend to pass it off as a provincial responsibility, but for the sake of national unity and cohesion, the education system cannot be overlooked.
One of the drivers of hate is also one of the drivers of polarization. Generally speaking, no matter where you look, polarization has increased over time, and the middle is drying up. People are going one way or the other, and everyone is moving apart. It can be on a variety of issues. It could be on climate change. It could be on vaccines. It could be on anything. This is where the study of polarization has to overlap with the study of hatred. It will take many disciplines to come together.
The reality is that we don't get information anymore from benign conduits. We're being fed more and more information about what we like. If you interact with it, forward it and comment on it, the algorithms assume that you like it. You're going to get more and more. Tech companies know this and they take advantage of it. This serves their purposes. They don't have a duty to be responsible citizens. I think this is creating a wedge in society.
The answer is very complex. As I said earlier, the messaging to the public has to be very effective. It has to appeal to emotion and not be just fact-based. If we start with the education system to inoculate people against different types of echo chambers and inoculate people against logical fallacies and mental traps, that can start at a very young age. This goes beyond teaching math and spelling. This goes to the heart of logic. If we start in the elementary school system, I think we're going to be better off as a populace.