No, I'm sorry, I did not say that. I said I have access to a list that was generated by the sponsor of the bill, but I never received the impression from you, Madam Chair, or from the clerk, as to your willingness to receive that list. The information that I was receiving was, “That's fine, but the sponsor of the bill has to appear as our first witness.” I'm just indicating—and I think precedent is clearly established—that it is not a direction of Parliament. It is not a rule, per se, that a sponsor must always testify first.
When you have witnesses on a study as important as child exploitation material is to this country, and on the proliferation of this disgusting material not only in this country but worldwide, it's incumbent upon us as a nation and as parliamentarians to give it appropriate time to be studied.
I want to raise that, because—