It's not incumbent on any member of this committee to opine on relevance, as my friend and colleague, Ms. Ferreri, is just starting her intervention. There's no time limit. There's no document that specifies that relevant points must be immediately addressed by a member or that they can speak for only a limited amount of time and a percentage of that has to be on relevant points. There's always a degree of latitude exercised by chairs of all committees.
In my view, because the majority of us are lawyers, relevance is very subjective. It's not an objective term. I'm sure at some point in time, Ms. Ferreri, if she is given the opportunity for a fulsome intervention without unnecessary points of order, will loop it around to relevant issues germane to Mr. Maloney's motion.
Thank you.