Yes. Thank you for that. I have just a short time.
I do agree in some cases about robbery with a firearm, but when you look at a victim who doesn't know the difference between a pellet gun and a nine-millimetre or .45 calibre gun, I find it a little hard to imagine that we're going to remove mandatory minimums because somebody couldn't identify whether or not it was a pellet gun.
Let's talk about drug offences and the production of crystal meth. How can someone possibly say, “Yes, go ahead and produce it, and let's remove mandatory prison for drug dealers.” We have an opioid crisis on our hands in Canada. If we start dealing with removing mandatory minimums for trafficking and what you're talking about, what are we saying now to the victims and to the people we should be helping?
Do you not agree that maybe we should be spending way more time on crime prevention, not crime reduction? I do agree with you that putting people in jail isn't exactly the answer, but—