Thank you for your question.
I would say, at the outset, that it's important to put into context the fact that the bill establishes seven types of harmful content. When considering penalties for individuals, lawmakers mustn't go too far by unduly punishing individuals in connection with certain types of content.
As far as the penalties for operators are concerned, I will let those who wish to do so comment on the size of the fines. However, I will say that it's important to keep something in mind: the higher the penalty is, the clearer the duty needs to be. Otherwise, operators will want to fulfill the vague duties imposed on them at all costs, possibly at the expense of users' freedom of expression.
It comes back to the situation I described earlier. Taking an excessively cautious approach in relation to flagged content and responding in a very swift and disproportionate way to assess that content could be harmful to online free speech.