I do want to emphasize that my support for what should be fast-tracked for study is part 1. I fully support separating the bills. I think that parts 2 and 3 are fundamentally different.
With that in mind, with regard to the peace bond provisions, I defer significantly to criminal lawyers who are practising because my understanding is that there are so many hoops to jump through to be able to obtain a peace bond that this isn't the easy win that one would think, in going to court and chilling expression.
That said, the prospect of it can have that chilling effect. That's why I think much broader consultation is needed on that type of provision. I also am not sure if it's already needed. If the fear is of property crime, you can get a peace bond for that as it exists right now. I remain to be convinced that it is a tool that will be worthwhile.