That's a very good point. If we create these three organizations, we will have to ensure that there is a certain volume of business. If we deal with the more targeted issue of sexual victimization and set aside the issue of hateful content, will there be enough business to justify the creation of these three organizations? That's the question I wanted to put to you.
At the other end of the spectrum, however, the danger is that too many cases will be filed. If we add hate speech to sexual victimization, since the definition of harmful content is very broad, we could end up with an extremely high number of people filing complaints. This could result in very long delays. Generally speaking, administrative tribunals offer slightly faster and less costly access to justice than the courts, but some administrative tribunals are still overwhelmed by cases and there are very long delays. So we shouldn't think that just because an administrative route is created, there will necessarily be access to justice. It's difficult, but it's important to try to anticipate the volume of cases we'll have and the resources we'll need.
They said it was going to cost about $200 million. I think that estimate comes from the Parliamentary Budget Officer. You would think that with that kind of money, there would be relatively quick processing, but hate and online sexual victimization are such broad issues that it's quite likely there will be an extremely large volume of cases, where some complaints will be warranted and others less so, and you end up with a problem of access to justice. So I draw your attention to that.