I'll quickly read the definition of “intimate content” proposed in Bill C‑63:
(b) a visual recording…that falsely presents in a reasonably convincingly manner a person as being nude or exposing their sexual organs or anal region or engaged in explicit sexual activity, including a deepfake that presents a person in that manner, if it is reasonable to suspect that the person does not consent to the recording being communicated.
That seems like a rather long definition that seeks to cover a number of areas. Maybe I wouldn't have done any better. So it's not really a criticism.
Do you think that's a good definition, or should it be amended differently?