Okay, that's good. Thank you.
Thank you to all the witnesses.
Ms. Baron, I have a question for you. I'm reading from an article written by you that was published in The Hub on February 28 of this year. You said, “The internet is an ugly place.” I agree with you. There's a lot of good, and there's a lot of ugliness. You said that the online harms act is “a profoundly anti-free expression bill that threatens draconian penalties for online speech, chilling legitimate expression by the mere spectre of a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission or the new Digital Safety Commission of Canada.”
Now, you heard that the minister has parsed parts 2 and 3 out of this bill, so I'm assuming it's a less offensive bill. Here's my question for you. In your opinion, if we were to also remove part 1, so all that's left is part 4, would that be a good stand-alone bill? Could that work together with Bill C-412 as well?