Opponents of mandatory minimum penalties argue that they unjustly limit judicial discretion, have little or no deterrent effect and can result in disproportionate sentencing. The government argues that we should trust our judges across our country to do the right thing and hold offenders accountable, while at the same time promoting community safety.
I'd like to hear your thoughts based on your experience, both on the judicial issue and the deterrent impact of eliminating mandatory minimum penalties, particularly within the firearm context.