Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all of the witnesses for appearing as we continue to talk about Bill C-5.
Today in Parliament, we have Science Meets Parliament day, and I have guests with me who are listening to these proceedings this afternoon. Much of what we've heard about this act goes to spot facts, evidence, science and reports.
I have a question with my less than three minutes for Mr. Merraro.
The Gladue reports and the impact of race and cultural assessments, according to facts and what we have seen in many provinces and jurisdictions, help judges to understand the role of systemic racism and bringing someone before the courts. However, mandatory minimum penalties of imprisonment impose a one-size-fits-all approach to sentencing that prevents them from using that information to craft a fit sentence.
Can you tell us why judicial discretion, in your opinion, based on your 25 years of experience working with young people, is important in ensuring that people receive appropriate sentences that take into account all of their circumstances?