Thank you.
What I understand from this text is that the diversion measures that would be taken for an offender would be recorded on the relevant police force register. However, the offender's name would be known only to the judge presiding over the trial of the offence in question.
If, later on and on different dates, the individual reoffends by committing the same type of offence, this can never be presented to the court, whether or not the individual has complied with the conditions proposed as part of the diversion measures.
For example, we couldn't tell the judge that we tried to use diversion measures three or four times, but that the person didn't comply with the conditions imposed. Diversion measures are not judicial proceedings.
Perhaps the person was complying with the conditions imposed, but still reoffended. You couldn't tell the judge that this is the fifth offence of the same type, for example.
If the measures applied were diversion measures, you couldn't tell the judge that the individual is a repeat offender, even though diversion measures have been used three, five, 10 or 20 times.
Have I understood correctly?