Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I almost want to apologize to Ms. Owens and Ms. St. Germain. We are not asking them a lot of questions, but not because their testimony is not important. We took a lot of notes during their testimony.
Ms. Gaudreault, I am going to take the liberty of talking with you again, if you don't mind. Like Ms. Dhillon, I am going to come back to quite a few subjects, but I am ask you about something else.
I would first like to address the question of collateral victims — for instance, children of the victim, as well as children of the attacker. I believe they are included. For example, I am thinking about a young boy or girl whose father has been convicted at a criminal trial. Those children may suffer significant harm.
In your opinion, should the CVBR not be adapted to give more weight to this aspect and make sure that children or spouses who are not involved in the crime, whether as victims or attackers, but who suffer the consequences, are better protected?