Absolutely: We know that subsection 213(1.1) is a new provision that was introduced under PCEPA that criminalizes public communication in places near children—schoolyards, day cares and parks. There's also the section 213 that was not struck down under the Bedford decision, which is about impeding traffic for the purpose of prostitution. Obviously, sex workers are living in fear of criminality when their peers, their managers and their workplaces are criminalized. That has impacts on their ability to report.
Sex workers also, in many cases, are third parties themselves. Daphne talked about working in collectives and working with other people who provide mutual support and services to one another, and they are caught under that net of criminality. In the research I did, we talked to sex workers who've been charged under third party offences—the material benefit or the advertising or the procuring ones—because they were providing that service to another sex worker. They're absolutely still criminalized under the new laws.