There are three parts to the Victims Bill of Rights—information, protection and participation—that I look at particularly as a victim. Throughout the process, as I navigated the legal system, I felt that those did not apply to me.
I was not protected, due to either malice or negligence on the part of the Crown, from having a publication ban placed on my identity without any knowledge. I could have lost my job. I am a public servant and I have to maintain a security clearance. If I am charged with a crime, my job is gone.
Regarding information, it was like pulling teeth to try to understand how to navigate the legal process. I tried to go to legal aid. I tried to access sexual assault centres. Nobody could help me. I really felt that I was alone. I had to scour CanLII by myself to try to find case law. There was simply no one to lean on, and the Crown didn't really have the time of day to speak with me. I understand resourcing issues, but as a victim at a time of need, there was really no support.
As for participation, I felt that I had a right to be asked whether or not I wanted a publication ban. That seems like a very foundational element of participation that nobody ever involved me in. I didn't even know that I could be involved. That's the case for many victims with whom I have been connected. I hope to share their stories today.
Quite frankly, the entire Victims Bill of Rights has 2,011 words. My victim impact statement, which has a number of critiques and comments on our system, has 2,300 words. It can definitely be expanded.