That's my experience as well, that some people want to be present.
That brings me to the third point. I think it's what you're referring to. It's under another provision of the code, section 715.1. It's that a child can actually give a statement to a police officer. If that statement is recorded—again, I'm simplifying this—and they say “Yes, I made that statement, and that statement is accurate”, then they don't have to retell their story. In other words, the statement itself is played. It is the telling of the story. It goes in place of the evidence. That applies only to children.
In the cases of sexual assault against adults, do you think that this would also be an effective measure to assist—not only in the trial process but also in the facilitation of not retraumatizing the victim?