You're correct. We were not consulted ahead of time. With regard to this bill, we know that it's truly an attempt to obviously address the Supreme Court's decision. It attempts to support victims and survivors of crime and hold offenders accountable.
The issue is that there was a reason this was put in place to begin with. I think the year was 1994, if I remember correctly. This decision really reopens that gap again, and it leaves women vulnerable to crimes. To be honest with you, we would have said that this decision shouldn't have been reversed to begin with or taken away to begin with.
We should still be able to know that women and girls can be protected without the potential for somebody to use self-induced intoxication as a defence.