Sure.
I think Minister Lametti has already spoken to the thought process that he took in terms of the decision to introduce the bill and the decision not to put a reference to the court.
As he said, we did have a bit of a road map from the Supreme Court and from the Brown decision. Certainly that informed the work that the department did to support the government in introducing the legislation, noting that charter considerations are detailed in the charter statement. As you know, the law that was passed in Bill C-28 is informed by the law that came before it.
Perhaps the last thing I could say, and my colleagues could jump in, would be that the criminal negligence standard is a well understood and accepted minimum fault requirement for criminal law, and that's based on Supreme Court guidance as well.
I think all of those things taken together provide some context as to why the route was taken as it was.