Another concern I have is the issue regarding alcohol as being the sole intoxicating substance. I seem to recall, long before the Supreme Court of Canada issued the Brown decision, the jurisprudence made it abundantly clear to prosecutors, particularly in Ontario, that alcohol alone would never succeed in a defence under section 33.1. Now, with this new legislation, and some of the reports I'm reading from some of the professors who testified before you, it would appear that alcohol is indeed open to that type of consideration.
Would you agree with that?