Thank you very much.
Very briefly, I was saying that there are three ways to fix this problem. One is to get rid of subsection 33.1(2). The second way is to change the foreseeability standard to loss of self-control rather than foreseeability of harm. The third option is to insert a reverse onus clause that requires the accused to show whether or not the harm was foreseeable. That's been upheld as constitutional in Daviault and in the context of the mental disorder defence as well.
Those are the three options.