I'm sometimes viewed as overly optimistic, but I've only been in Parliament for 11 years. Sometimes I've seen us do the right thing.
My last specific question, because I know we're running out of time, is on the standard of foreseeable harm versus the loss of control, which was very clear in the previous panel. Would you see it useful for us, if we weren't going to eliminate the section, to rewrite it so the focus is on foreseeability of loss of control rather than harm?