Yes. The discourse we have heard from the Supreme Court and from commentators is that alcohol is unlikely to lead to extreme intoxication. That means that as soon as someone proves there was extreme intoxication, there's no way to prove the foreseeability. Everyone is saying it's not foreseeable that alcohol would lead to extreme intoxication.
The other issue is that.... NAWL has consistently advocated for judicial training. There's been some progress on this, but it continues to be of concern. Again, just because an academic says something in an article or the Supreme Court even says something, it doesn't mean that it will reach all judges and that it will be applied consistently.