Very quickly, I think it's a very sound recommendation. As I understand it, it would replace the Supreme Court. It stops at the Federal Court of Appeal. It's possible that could be challenged for not having a further level, but the point is that the Supreme Court doesn't give leave except in a minor number of cases. Her reasoning is absolutely spot on.
I would add one thing. Judicial review is ousted for the judge, but I hope I haven't missed something in the amended act that would oust judicial review for complainants, because at the moment the only way complainants can really understand what's going on, as I described to you, is by getting hold of what the decisions were when a case was dismissed or dealt with and not completely dismissed.
We're talking only about the judge here—the judge going up that stream—not about the complainants, I hope.