I want to pick on one feature that is proposed that I find unique and interesting, which is including lay persons on review committees. I'll start with Ms. Conlon, to get her views on this. I found that very interesting, because we rely on lay persons when we're appointing judges as part of the JAAC process, the judicial appointments advisory committee process, and to now to see lay persons involved in the review of judicial conduct or misconduct is interesting.
Ms. Conlon, what are your thoughts on that? Do you see benefits to adding lay individuals in this review process?