I certainly understand that, especially when the literature is changing and developing.
It seems to me that it would be incumbent not only on the public to want it, but on the judges themselves. I don't know any judges who say they're going to set out to not make the best decision they can. Part of the best decision you can make, in any context, is understanding the witness who is before you. Understanding the witnesses before you, as you have mentioned, is that trauma-informed practice.
I thank you for that contribution.
You didn't get to finish your comment on anonymous complaints. I was going to ask a question about it. I find this interesting because I believe that two members of the reviewing panel would have to approve anonymous complaints.
You didn't get to answer the question about that. The floor is yours for whatever time I have left if you'd like to answer that question.