That's an interesting question. I think the change to include lay members on the hearing panels adds a significant amount of transparency to the process. The fact that we will have the point of view of the public is valuable in that regard. Certainly, public hearings are public hearings, so that creates an amount of transparency as well.
I do believe that Bill C-9 has tried to seek and establish that balance between those matters that are smaller and may not require being made public because they can be addressed through the screening process versus those matters of more significance where we start to see a more formalized administrative process and hearing process. I think the involvement of the public in particular—the lay members—is a valuable addition.