Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Ms. Maharaj, for being with us today representing the Canadian Bar Association. I think you captured very succinctly the challenge here that Bill C-9 is trying to meet, which is to balance the independence of judges with public confidence, but I would also add the rights of those judges who are being disciplined.
I want to return to the question of an effective appeal. We know the Supreme Court has set a very high bar for granting leave to hear cases and that these cases must in fact, in common language, be of national significance or national importance or constitutional importance before they'll actually be heard. I'm wondering, in that case, how often we could expect that the Supreme Court would actually hear appeals from this process, given that very high bar they've set.