It's not entirely clear. I believe the CJC is exempt from access to information and privacy laws, so I'm not.... Unfortunately, I don't have that answer right in front of me.
Generally speaking, I think the council is very conscious of confidentiality and has always attempted to protect it whenever possible. It might be able to read that into the provision, but the bill has erred on the side of caution and always indicated in those other provisions, as I said, that confidential and personal information need to be protected when it's necessary. To indicate it here would follow the policy that the bill has established in these other provisions.
Another example is proposed subsection 147(3) when there's an independent review of financial provisions. That report of the financial review is issued every five years. Again, there's an exhortation there to protect personal and confidential information. It's to err on the side of caution and ensure that that information is, indeed, protected.