The term as proposed by the private member's bill would only include child abuse materials. As drafted, the bill would only include part of the definition under section 163.1 of the Criminal Code and the offences.
The definition currently captures two types of materials. Here, I'll ask my colleague to step in if I miss anything.
First is abuse to a child. Second is any materials that are child exploitative in nature. It doesn't have to be real; it could be fictional.
The addition of “exploitation” would ensure that the term encapsulates both materials that are defined in the definition that are already in the definition. It's not a substantive change. It would be a change in the term only to reflect what is already captured in the definition.
I'll ask my colleague Ms. Peres if she wants to add anything.