Yes, that would be the heart of my comment as well.
Human rights questions, to my mind, are not political questions. They're legal questions, because rights are legally cognizable under law. They are meant to be affirmed, recognized and protected under Canadian law and under international law. Canada has obligations in both those regards.
Fundamentally, human rights-oriented issues...and we're really talking about the criminal process type of issues such as incarceration, such as facing double jeopardy and so on. These are, fundamentally, legal questions that should be answered by the courts, which are uniquely empowered and able to do so. Frankly, in our adversarial decision-making system, both the parties—the individual sought and their counsel, and the government—are able to put forward evidence upon which those decisions can be made, so I think the courts are just a better place for many of those questions.