I have to very careful about talking about specific cases. That one is ongoing, in a number of different ways.
However, when somebody is extradited, there has to be evidence that they've been charged with an offence. There was argument before the courts—I think I can mention it because it was before the courts—that the Diab case didn't constitute being charged, because he was under what they call “a form of investigation”. It was found to be the equivalent to being at the preliminary inquiry stage in Canada.
It is such a different system that they have in France. Again, that's where we have to be very careful not to superimpose our particular approach on the foreign country. The courts in Canada, and also courts in the U.K., have found that the approach in France, whereby they bring the person in front of an investigating magistrate, which is kind of the long version of the preliminary inquiry, is the equivalent of being charged.
We have a requirement that a person has to be charged; it's a question of what that means in a particular country.