It is difficult, but I think it should be difficult to prove there is a risk of torture.
The other thing we often use, in the U.K., is an expert witness. Once you have the objective material showing torture can be prevalent in particular countries, in particular situations [Technical difficulty—Editor] show it may apply to an individual. Ordinarily, the court is assisted by somebody who is an expert in that country, one who can say, “Look, I'm applying the generalities to this specific individual and, in my opinion, this individual is at risk of torture.”
It's difficult to do, but I think the greater problem is the one I highlighted earlier: that this is now routinely met with a diplomatic assurance. Even if the risk exists, there's no need to be concerned about it, because they give you an assurance it won't happen in this particular case.