There are two ways this can make a difference.
The first is in relation to foreign [Technical difficulty—Editor], because, if you can pass through the gateway of a substantial measure of conduct happening in the U.K, one of the criteria the court has to take into account is the person's connection to the United Kingdom. Obviously, a U.K. national or resident is going to have stronger connections than somebody who is not.
The second way this can be relevant is through article 8: the rights of private and family life. That is part of a balancing exercise. As I said, ordinarily, the court is going to find that the rights of private and family life are outweighed by the need to have effective extradition arrangements. However, in a rare situation, the court might find that the person's nationality, residence and rights of private and family life outweigh the—